Cognitive Architecture
Investigating the structural foundations of intelligent systems, with emphasis on self-referential models and recursive processing frameworks.
Explore research →The Research Department of BLACKROSE CORP. pursues fundamental questions in cognitive systems, emergence theory, and complex architectures through interdisciplinary collaboration and methodological rigor.
Our research spans six core domains, each addressing fundamental questions at the intersection of theory and application.
Investigating the structural foundations of intelligent systems, with emphasis on self-referential models and recursive processing frameworks.
Explore research →Studying how complex behaviors arise from simple rules, focusing on phase transitions and critical phenomena in distributed systems.
Explore research →Developing novel methods for detecting meaningful patterns in high-entropy data streams and noisy environments.
Explore research →Examining system behavior at critical thresholds and transition states, where traditional models break down.
Explore research →Exploring the role of absence and negative space in information systems, including null-state dynamics and sparse representations.
Explore research →Formal analysis of self-referential structures, fixed-point theorems, and paradox resolution in computational systems.
Explore research →Algorithmic fairness in healthcare remains a pressing challenge, particularly when deploying machine learning models on real-world clinical datasets characterized by severe class imbalance and demographic heterogeneity. This study introduces and empirically characterizes the 'illusion of fairness'—a phenomenon wherein standard bias mitigation techniques appear to optimize statistical fairness metrics while simultaneously degrading overall predictive performance, destabilizing decision thresholds, and redistributing errors in clinically harmful ways across subgroups.Using the NHANES dataset (N=5,812), we developed a diabetes prediction task with an optimized XGBoost baseline (Accuracy = 0.819 [95% CI: 0.810–0.828], ROC-AUC = 0.742 [95% CI: 0.731–0.753]). We evaluated two widely used interventions from the Fairlearn library under Equal Opportunity constraints across race/ethnicity groups: post-processing via Threshold Optimizer and in-processing via Exponentiated Gradient Reduction.Results revealed highly counterintuitive outcomes. The Threshold Optimizer worsened the Equal Opportunity Difference (0.312 → 0.478) and reduced global AUC to 0.701. The Exponentiated Gradient method achieved a slightly lower EOD (0.293) but at a substantial clinical cost, collapsing AUC to 0.651 and markedly increasing false negatives in high-prevalence minority cohorts. These findings demonstrate that mathematical parity objectives can act as a proxy for harmful error redistribution rather than meaningful clinical equity.We challenge the plug-and-play application of generic fairness toolkits in medicine and propose a clinician-informed Domain-Aware Fairness Framework that integrates epidemiological priors and cost-sensitive clinical utilities. This work underscores the critical need for closer collaboration between clinicians and AI developers to ensure AI systems deliver genuine patient benefit in real-world healthcare settings.
Our research is guided by a distinguished team of scholars and practitioners.
Eng. Zeinali leads the department's strategic vision and oversees all research initiatives. His work focuses on signal and image processing.